Advertisement

Developing a group-based virtual education curriculum for cardiac rehabilitation and the associated toolkit to support implementation in Canada and across the globe

Published:September 06, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.08.011

      Highlights

      • A 4-phase approach was used to develop the new virtual education curriculum for CR.
      • A toolkit that included patient-centered and facilitator manuals was created.
      • The level of user engagement and acceptability with the curriculum was acceptable.

      Abstract

      Background

      To overcome the many barriers faced by the long-lasting pandemic, the development of new ways to deliver cardiac rehabilitation (CR)’s components was needed.

      Objective

      This mixed-methods study describes the process to create a virtual education curriculum and assess the level of user engagement and acceptability in CR participants.

      Methods

      A 4-phase approach was used to develop the new virtual education curriculum for CR and collect feedback regarding patients’ engagement with and acceptability of the curriculum in a convenience sample of 80 CR participants. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach and mapped to the evidence-based implementation strategies, followed by stakeholder engagement. Considering all information gathered and applying best practices in patient education and curriculum development, a 16-week virtual education curriculum was established.

      Results

      Five themes were identified on how the current education could be improved: focus on self-management, emphasize emotional wellbeing, improve facilitation, incorporate existing resources, and improve content flow. The recommendations associated with each theme informed the new curriculum and a tailored implementation plan to support the use of virtual education as part of routine care within the program. A toolkit that included a screening tool for comfort with/access to technology, patient-centered manuals with weekly learning plans, and a facilitator's manual was created. Overall, all recommended weekly education was completed by more than 70% of the participants, with greater acceptability.

      Conclusions

      The present study offers an example of a collaborative approach to tailoring strategies for the development of a new group-based virtual education model of CR.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      CR (Cardiac Rehabilitation), CVD (Cardiovascular diseases), REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), VCR (Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators
        Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019 [published correction appears in Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1562].
        Lancet. 2020; 396: 1204-1222
        • Tarride J.E.
        • Lim M.
        • DesMeules M.
        • et al.
        A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease.
        Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25: e195-e202
        • Gheorghe A.
        • Griffiths U.
        • Murphy A.
        • Legido-Quigley H.
        • Lamptey P.
        • Perel P.
        The economic burden of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
        BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 975
        • Dibben G.
        • Faulkner J.
        • Oldridge N.
        • et al.
        Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 11CD001800
        • Taylor R.S.
        • Dalal H.M.
        • McDonagh S.T.J.
        The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes.
        Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022; 19: 180-194
        • Francis T.
        • Kabboul N.
        • Rac V.
        • et al.
        The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
        Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35: 352-364
        • Turk-Adawi K.
        • Supervia M.
        • Lopez-Jimenez F.
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation availability and density around the Globe.
        EClinicalMedicine. 2019; 13: 31-45
        • Grace S.L.
        • Kotseva K.
        • Whooley M.A.
        Cardiac rehabilitation: under-utilized globally.
        Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021; 23: 118
        • Anderson L.
        • Sharp G.A.
        • Norton R.J.
        • et al.
        Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6CD007130
        • Jin K.
        • Khonsari S.
        • Gallagher R.
        • et al.
        Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019; 18: 260-271
        • Huang K.
        • Liu W.
        • He D.
        • et al.
        Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015; 22: 959-971
        • Bakhshayesh S.
        • Hoseini B.
        • Bergquist R.
        • et al.
        Cost-utility analysis of home-based cardiac rehabilitation as compared to usual post-discharge care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020; 18: 761-776
        • Lima de Melo Ghisi G.
        • Pesah E.
        • Turk-Adawi K.
        • Supervia M.
        • Lopez Jimenez F.
        • Grace S.L.
        Cardiac rehabilitation models around the globe.
        J Clin Med. 2018; 7: 260
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Xu Z.
        • Liu X.
        • et al.
        Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation delivery around the world.
        Glob Heart. 2021; 16: 43
        • Thomas E.
        • Gallagher R.
        • Grace S.L.
        Future-proofing cardiac rehabilitation: transitioning services to telehealth during COVID-19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 5].
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020; (2047487320922926)
        • Neubeck L.
        • Hansen T.
        • Jaarsma T.
        • Klompstra L.
        • Gallagher R.
        Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19: A rapid review of the evidence.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020; 19: 486-494
        • Marzolini S.
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Hébert A.A.
        • Ahden S.
        • Oh P.
        Cardiac rehabilitation in canada during COVID-19.
        CJC Open. 2021; 3: 152-158
        • O'Doherty A.F.
        • Humphreys H.
        • Dawkes S.
        • et al.
        How has technology been used to deliver cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic? An international cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals conducted by the BACPR.
        BMJ Open. 2021; 11e046051
        • Scherrenberg M.
        • Wilhelm M.
        • Hansen D.
        • et al.
        The future is now: a call for action for cardiac telerehabilitation in the COVID-19 pandemic from the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European association of preventive cardiology [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 3].
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020; (2047487320939671)
        • Moulson N.
        • Bewick D.
        • Selway T.
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 era: guidance on implementing virtual care.
        Can J Cardiol. 2020; 36: 1317-1321
        • Khera A.
        • Baum S.J.
        • Gluckman T.J.
        • et al.
        Continuity of care and outpatient management for patients with and at high risk for cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scientific statement from the American society for preventive cardiology.
        Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020; 1100009
        • Mureddu G.F.
        • Ambrosetti M.
        • Venturini E.
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Position paper of the AICPR (Italian association of clinical cardiology, prevention and rehabilitation).
        Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020; 90https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2020.1439
        • Dawkes S.
        • Hughes S.
        • Ray S.
        • et al.
        Joint BACPR/BCS/BHF statement on cardiac rehabilitation services.
        Br J Cardiol. 2020; 27: 50
        • Cheng Y.Y.
        • Chen C.M.
        • Huang W.C.
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation programs for patients with coronavirus disease 2019: consensus statements of Taiwan academy of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation.
        J Formos Med Assoc. 2021; 120: 83-92
      1. AACVPR (American Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation) fact sheet: virtual delivery of cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation opportunities during the COVID 19 pandemic. 2021. Accessed 20 April 2022. https://www.aacvpr.org/Portals/0/Docs/AACVPR%20Fact%20Sheet_Virtual%20Delivery_2.1.21.pdf?ver=2021-03-09-145757-507

        • Grossman G.B.
        • Sellera C.A.C.
        • Hossri C.A.C.
        • et al.
        Position statement of the Brazilian society of cardiology department of exercise testing, sports exercise, nuclear cardiology, and cardiovascular rehabilitation (DERC/SBC) on activities within its scope of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. posicionamento do departamento de ergometria, exercício, cardiologia nuclear e reabilitação cardiovascular (DERC/SBC) sobre a atuação médica em suas áreas durante a pandemia por COVID-19.
        Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115: 284-291
        • Leochico C.F.D.
        • Espiritu A.I.
        • Ignacio S.D.
        • Mojica J.A.P.
        Challenges to the emergence of telerehabilitation in a developing country: a systematic review.
        Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 1007
        • Cartledge S.
        • Rawstorn J.C.
        • Tran M.
        • Ryan P.
        • Howden E.J.
        • Jackson A.
        Telehealth is here to stay but not without challenges: a consultation of cardiac rehabilitation clinicians during COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia [published online ahead of print, 2021 Dec 22].
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022; 21: 548-558https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab118
        • Frota A.X.
        • Vieira M.C.
        • Soares C.C.S.
        • et al.
        Functional capacity and rehabilitation strategies in COVID-19 patients: current knowledge and challenges.
        Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021; 54e07892020
        • Lam J.
        • Ahmad K.
        • Gin K.
        • Chow C.M.
        Deliver cardiac virtual care: a primer for cardiovascular professionals in Canada.
        CJC Open. 2022; 4: 148-157
        • Anderson L.
        • Brown J.P.
        • Clark A.M.
        • et al.
        Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6CD008895
        • Ghisi G.L.
        • Abdallah F.
        • Grace S.L.
        • Thomas S.
        • Oh P.
        A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change?.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 95: 160-174
        • Barnason S.
        • White-Williams C.
        • Rossi L.P.
        • et al.
        Evidence for therapeutic patient education interventions to promote cardiovascular patient self-management: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10e000025
        • Shi W.
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Zhang L.
        • Hyun K.
        • Pakosh M.
        • Gallagher R.
        A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of patient education for secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: impact on psychological outcomes [published online ahead of print, 2022 Feb 4].
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022; : zvac001
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Rouleau F.
        • Ross M.K.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of an education intervention among cardiac rehabilitation patients in Canada: a multi-site study.
        CJC Open. 2020; 2: 214-221
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Grace S.L.
        • Anchique C.V.
        • et al.
        Translation and evaluation of a comprehensive educational program for cardiac rehabilitation patients in Latin America: a multi-national, longitudinal study.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2021; 104: 1140-1148
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Chaves G.S.S.
        • Ribeiro A.L.
        • Oh P.
        • Britto R.R.
        • Grace S.L.
        Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation effectiveness in a middle-income setting: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020; 40: 399-406
        • Xia L.
        • Grace S.L.
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • et al.
        Controlled pilot test of a translated cardiac rehabilitation education curriculum in percutaneous coronary intervention patients in a middle-income country delivered using Wechat: acceptability, engagement, satisfaction, and preliminary outcomes.
        Health Educ Res. 2022; (Under review)
        • Vanzella L.M.
        • Oh P.
        • Pakosh M.
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        Barriers and facilitators to virtual education in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies [published online ahead of print, 2021 Dec 23].
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022; 21: 414-429https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab114
        • Kelly W.
        • Meyer H.S.
        • Blackstock F.
        • Moy M.
        • Blackstock F.
        • Nici L.
        Best practice in educational design for patient learning.
        Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham, 2020https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_4
        • Kennedy M.B.B.
        • Parish A.L.
        Educational theory and cognitive science: practical principles to improve patient education.
        Nurs Clin N Am. 2021; 56: 401-412
        • Knowles M.S.
        • Holton E.F.
        • Swanson R.A.
        • Robinson P.
        The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development.
        Routledge, London & New York2020
        • Health Care Education Association
        Patient Education Practice Guidelines for Health Care Professionals.
        Health Care Education Association, 2021 (Accessed 20 April 2022)
        • Levac D.
        • Glegg S.M.N.
        • Camden C.
        • et al.
        Best practice recommendations for the development, implementation, and evaluation of online knowledge translation resources in rehabilitation.
        Phys Ther. 2015; 95: 648-662
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Cotie L.M.
        • Ghisi G.L.M.
        • Vanzella L.M.
        • Aultman C.
        • Oh P.
        • Colella T.J.F.
        A social-ecological perspective of the perceived barriers and facilitators to virtual education in cardiac rehabilitation: a MIXED-METHODS APPROACH [published online ahead of print, 2022 Feb 18].
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000663
        • Wild D.
        • Grove A.
        • Martin M.
        • et al.
        Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation.
        Value Health. 2005; 8: 94-104