Advertisement

Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated ICU patients in Saudi Arabia: Results of an ICU-wide national survey

      Abstract

      Background

      Improved outcomes for patients on mechanical ventilation may be achieved with early mobilization (EM). However, it is not clear how widely this strategy is adopted into routine intensive care unit (ICU) practice in Saudi Arabia.

      Objectives

      This study was conducted to describe the present practices and challenges to providing EM for mechanically ventilated patients, which may drive dissemination and implementation activities.

      Methods

      We approached 205 ICUs across Saudi Arabia using a validated tool to assess ICU characteristics, the practices of EM for mechanically ventilated patients, and the barriers to providing EM.

      Results

      We approached 205 ICU persons in charge and achieved a 65% response rate (133 ICUs). The prevalence of EM for mechanically ventilated patients was 47% (63 ICUs). A total of 85 (64%) of the respondents reported having no previous training in EM. The absence of a written protocol was reported by 55% of the ICU practitioners in charge, 36% started EM within 2 to 5 days of critical illness, and 35% reported that performing EM for mechanically ventilated patients was totally dependent on physicians’ orders. Forty-seven percent of the ICUs that practised EM had at least one coordinator or person in charge of facilitating EM. The highest level of EM with mechanically ventilated patients was 35/63 (55%) with patients remaining in-bed and 28/63 (45%) with patient getting out of bed. A majority of the respondents (39, 64%) performed EM once daily for an interval period of more than 15 min. Previous training in EM and years of experience of the ICU person in charge were significant factors that promoted EM for mechanically ventilated ICU patients (OR: 7.6 (3.37–17.26); p < 0.001 and OR: 1.07 (1.01–1.14), p = 0.004, respectively). Existing protocols increased the odds of starting EM within 2 to 5 days of critical illness by six-fold (OR: 6.03 (1.79–20.30); p = 0.004). No written guidelines/protocols available for EM, medical instability, and limited staff were the most common hospital-, patient- and health care provider-related barriers to EM in the ICUs, respectively.

      Conclusion

      The prevalence of EM for mechanically ventilated patients across Saudi Arabia was 47%, although only 36% of the ICU staff had previous training in EM. Targeting modifiable barriers to EM, including a lack of training, guidelines and protocols, and staffing, will help to promote EM in Saudi Arabian ICUs.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Denehy L.
        • Lanphere J.
        • Needham D.M.
        Ten reasons why ICU patients should be mobilized early.
        Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43: 86-90
        • Fan E.
        • Dowdy D.W.
        • Colantuoni E.
        • et al.
        Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study.
        Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: 849-859
        • Hermans G.
        • Van Mechelen H.
        • Clerckx B.
        • et al.
        Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 190: 410-420
        • Parry S.M.
        • El-Ansary D.
        • Cartwright M.S.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonography in the intensive care setting can be used to detect changes in the quality and quantity of muscle and is related to muscle strength and function.
        J Crit Care. 2015; 30 (1151.e9–1151.14)
        • Cameron S.
        • Ball I.
        • Cepinskas G.
        • et al.
        Early mobilization in the critical care unit: a review of adult and pediatric literature.
        J Crit Care. 2015; 30: 664-672
        • Bailey P.
        • Thomsen G.E.
        • Spuhler V.J.
        • et al.
        Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients.
        Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 139-145
        • Hashem M.D.
        • Parker A.M.
        • Needham D.M.
        Early mobilization and rehabilitation of patients who are critically Ill.
        Chest. 2016; 150: 722-731
        • Bakhru R.N.
        • Wiebe D.J.
        • McWilliams D.J.
        • Spuhler V.J.
        • Schweickert W.D.
        An environmental scan for early mobilization practices in U.S. ICUs.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 2360-2369
        • Jolley S.E.
        • Regan-Baggs J.
        • Dickson R.P.
        • Hough C.L.
        Medical intensive care unit clinician attitudes and perceived barriers towards early mobilization of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey study.
        BMC Anesthesiol. 2014; 14: 84
        • McWilliams D.J.
        Reading between the lines, the key to successfully implementing early rehabilitation in critical care.
        Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 42: 5-7
        • Zhang H.
        • Liu H.
        • Li Z.
        • et al.
        Early mobilization implementation for critical ill patients: a cross-sectional multi-center survey about knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of critical care nurses.
        Int J Nurs Sci. 2021; 9: 49-55
        • Hickmann C.E.
        • Castanares-Zapatero D.
        • Bialais E.
        • et al.
        Teamwork enables high level of early mobilization in critically ill patients.
        Ann Intensive Care. 2016; 6: 80
        • Qutub H.O.
        • Matani A.S.
        • Farooqi F.A.
        Survey of respiratory care professionals' knowledge in early mobilization: a pilot study.
        J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018; 8: 208-212
        • Bein T.
        • Bischoff M.
        • Brückner U.
        • et al.
        S2e guideline: positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders : revision 2015: s2e guideline of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI).
        Anaesthesist. 2015; 64: 1-26
        • Hodgson C.L.
        • Capell E.
        • Tipping C.J.
        Early mobilization of patients in intensive care: organization, communication and safety factors that influence translation into clinical practice.
        Crit Care. 2018; 22: 77
        • Lang J.K.
        • Paykel M.S.
        • Haines K.J.
        • Hodgson C.L.
        Clinical practice guidelines for early mobilization in the ICU: a systematic review.
        Crit Care Med. 2020; 48 (e1121-e8)
        • Schweickert W.D.
        • Pohlman M.C.
        • Pohlman A.S.
        • et al.
        Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 1874-1882
        • Zang K.
        • Chen B.
        • Wang M.
        • et al.
        The effect of early mobilization in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.
        Nurs Crit Care. 2020; 25: 360-367
        • Ding N.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Zhang C.
        • et al.
        What is the optimum time for initiation of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients? A network meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14e0223151
        • Alqahtani J.S.
        Prevalence, incidence, morbidity and mortality rates of COPD in Saudi Arabia: trends in burden of COPD from 1990 to 2019.
        PLoS One. 2022; 17e0268772
        • Klompas M.
        Potential strategies to prevent ventilator-associated events.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 192: 1420-1430
        • Alqahtani J.S.
        • AlAhmari M.D.
        • Alshamrani K.H.
        • et al.
        Patient-ventilator asynchrony in critical care settings: national outcomes of ventilator waveform analysis.
        Heart Lung. 2020; 49: 630-636
        • Sreedharan J.
        • Alqahtani J.
        Driving pressure: clinical applications and implications in the intensive care units.
        Indian J Respir Care. 2018; 7: 62-66
        • Koo K.K.
        • Choong K.
        • Cook D.J.
        • et al.
        Early mobilization of critically ill adults: a survey of knowledge, perceptions and practices of Canadian physicians and physiotherapists.
        CMAJ Open. 2016; 4: E448-Ee54
        • Sommers J.
        • Engelbert R.H.
        • Dettling-Ihnenfeldt D.
        • et al.
        Physiotherapy in the intensive care unit: an evidence-based, expert driven, practical statement and rehabilitation recommendations.
        Clin Rehabil. 2015; 29: 1051-1063
        • Zanni J.M.
        • Korupolu R.
        • Fan E.
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project.
        J Crit Care. 2010; 25: 254-262
        • Alqahtani J.S.
        • Aldabayan Y.S.
        • AlAhmari M.D.
        • et al.
        Clinical practice and barriers of ventilatory support management in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia: a survey of respiratory therapists.
        Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2021; 9: 223-229
        • Driscoll A.
        • Grant M.J.
        • Carroll D.
        • et al.
        The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017; 17: 6-22