Advertisement

The impact of an electronic medical record surveillance program on outcomes for patients with sepsis

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To evaluate the effects of this EMR surveillance on sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock outcomes in patients admitted to a medical telemetry unit, including length of hospital stay, patient discharge and mortality.

      Methods

      A retrospective review of pre- and post-implementation of a pilot electronic medical record (EMR) sepsis surveillance.

      Results

      Implementing EMR sepsis surveillance significantly improved home discharge (49.0% versus 25.3%, p < .05) and reduced hospital mortality (1.0% versus 9.3%, p < .05). Although there was no difference in the length of hospital stay for the whole group, patients in the surveillance group who triggered an alert on the EMR surveillance had a decreased length of hospital stay compared to those without an alert (7.2 ± 4.2 versus 11.6 ± 9.4 days, p < .05).

      Conclusion

      These results offer promising evidence that the use of an EMR sepsis surveillance alert could decrease the ravishing effects of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock by early identification and treatment.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Steen C.
        Developments in the management of patients with sepsis.
        Nursing Standard. 2009; 23: 48-55
        • Martin G.S.
        Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes.
        Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012 June; 10: 701-706
        • Obrien J.
        • Aberegg S.
        • Ali N.
        • Diette G.
        • Lemeshow S.
        Results from the national sepsis practice survey: predictions about mortality and recommendations for limitation of care orders.
        Crit Care. 2009; 13: 1-11
        • Lukaszewicz A.
        • Payen D.
        The future is predetermined in severe sepsis, so what are the implications?.
        Crit Care Med. 2010; 38: 512-517
        • Azevedo L.
        • Park M.
        • Schettino G.
        Novel potential therapies for septic shock.
        Shock. 2008; 30: 60-66
        • Wang H.
        • Shapiro N.
        • Angus D.
        • Yealy D.
        National estimates of severe sepsis in the United States emergency departments.
        Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 1928
        • Poulton B.
        Advances in management of sepsis: the randomized controlled trials behind the surviving sepsis campaign recommendations.
        Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006; 27: 97-101
        • Dellinger R.P.
        • Levy M.M.
        • Carlet J.M.
        • et al.
        Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock.
        Crit Care Med. 2008; 36: 296-327
        • Stoneking L.
        • Denninghoff K.
        • DeLuca L.
        • Keim S.
        • Munger B.
        Sepsis bundles and compliance with clinical guidelines.
        J Intensive Care Med. 2011; 26: 172-182
        • Rivers E.
        • Ahrens T.
        Improving outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock: tools for early identification of at risk patients and treatment protocol implementation.
        Crit Care Clin. 2008; 23: 1-47
        • Funk D.
        • Sebat F.
        • Kumar A.
        A systems approach to the early recognition and rapid administration of best practice therapy in sepsis and septic shock.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009; 15: 301-307
        • Salluh J.
        • Bozza P.
        • Bozza F.
        Surviving sepsis campaign: a critical reappraisal.
        Shock. 2008; 3: 70-72
        • Nguyen H.
        • Underwood L.
        • Ginkel C.
        • et al.
        An educational course including medical simulation for early goal directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: an evaluation for medical student training.
        Resuscitation. 2008; 80: 674-679
        • Compilation J.
        Sepsis bundles: time for a nursing initiative? British Association of Critical Care Nurses.
        Nurs Crit Care. 2009; 14: 161-165
        • Ferrer R.
        • Artigas A.
        • Suarez D.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis.
        Am J Respir Care Med. 2009; 180: 861-866
        • Puskarich M.
        • Marchick M.
        • Kline J.
        • Steuerwald M.
        • Jones A.
        One year mortality of patients treated with an emergency department based early goal directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock: a before and after study.
        Crit Care. 2009; 13: 167-173
        • Gerald J.
        • Alsip J.
        • Hicks J.
        • Waldrum M.
        • Dunlap N.
        Using the EMR to perform continuous real-time surveillance to identify hospitalized patients at risk for sepsis.
        Chest. 2011; : 426
      1. Campion, M. Hospital charges surge for treating severe sepsis, but reasons unclear. Anesthesiology News. 36:7.