Advertisement

Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: An analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions

      Background

      Inserting an intravenous catheter (IV) is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures by nurses. Little research has been conducted on ways to reduce the difficulty and failure, and enhance the ease and success, of IV insertion. We conducted this study to determine variables associated with IV insertion difficulty, failure, and success, and to learn special techniques nurses use to facilitate IV insertion.

      Methods

      Data were collected on 339 IV insertions in hospitalized patients by 34 registered nurses. The data included information about the nurse (eg, age, education, and self-rated IV insertion skill); the patient (eg, age and race); the IV (eg, site, gauge, and type); and the IV insertion, (eg, duration and difficulty). Data were analyzed to determine the effects of these variables on IV insertion outcome. In addition, nurses were asked to describe special techniques they used to facilitate IV insertion.

      Results

      A total of 77% of the IV insertions were successful. Nurses who were older, had more years of experience, were certified in a specialty, and rated themselves higher in insertion skill had significantly more successful insertions than their younger and less-experienced and less-skilled counterparts (P < .001). Successful IV insertions were significantly faster (mean 32 seconds) than unsuccessful ones (mean 66 seconds) (P < .001), and were rated as significantly less difficult (P < .001). Failed IV insertions were associated with higher degrees of difficulty arising from vein variables, such as vein rolled or vein was resistant to puncture, and patient variables, such as tough or dark skin and patient movement. The nurses described a wide variety of techniques to facilitate insertion success. The most frequently mentioned were getting self and patient in a comfortable position, using mechanical stimulation such as tapping the vein, and stabilizing the vein.

      Conclusion

      Approximately one fourth of the 339 IV insertions in this study were unsuccessful. Repeated insertion attempts are painful and costly. This study identified nurse, patient, and IV variables associated with IV insertion success and failure. Future research is needed to confirm and expand these findings and to develop interventions to improve IV insertion skills and outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bulechek G.M.
        • McCloskey J.C.
        • Titler M.G.
        • Denehey J.A.
        Nursing interventions used in practice (Report on the NIC Project).
        Am J Nurs. 1994; 94: 59-64
        • Singer A.J.
        • Richman P.B.
        • Kowalska A.
        • Thode H.C.
        Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33: 652-658
        • Jacobson A.F.
        Intradermal normal saline, self-selected music, and insertion difficulty effects on IV insertion pain.
        Heart Lung. 1999; 28: 114-122
        • Cosentino F.
        I can start that IV with one attempt.
        NITA. 1984; 7: 377-378
        • Frey A.M.
        Success rates for peripheral IV insertion in a children’s hospital.
        J Intraven Nurs. 1998; 21: 160-165
      1. Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellenger EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR 2002;51(RR10):1-26. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5110a1.htm. Retrieved April 5, 2005.

        • Jacobson A.F.
        Effect of intradermal normal saline, listening to music, and insertion difficulty on pain of IV insertion [dissertation].
        in: Texas Woman’s University: Dissertation Abstracts International, Denton TX1995: B4815 (56-09)
        • Brown J.
        • Larson M.
        Pain during insertion of peripheral intravenous catheters with and without intradermal lidocaine.
        Clin Nurse Spec. 1999; 13: 283-285
        • Klein E.J.
        • Shugerman R.P.
        • Leigh-Taylor K.
        • Schneider C.
        • Portscheller D.
        • Koepsell T.
        Buffered lidocaine.
        Pediatrics. 1995; 95: 709-712
        • Baldursdottir G.
        • Jonsdottir H.
        The importance of nurse caring behaviors as perceived by patients receiving care at an emergency department.
        Heart Lung. 2002; 31: 67-75
        • Huggins K.N.
        • Gandy W.M.
        • Kohut C.N.
        Emergency department patients’ perception of nurse caring behaviors.
        Heart Lung. 1993; 22: 356-364
        • Larson P.J.
        Important nurse caring behaviors perceived by patients with cancer.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 1984; 11: 46-50
        • Larson P.J.
        Comparison of cancer patients’ and professional nurses’ perceptions of important nurse caring behaviors.
        Heart Lung. 1987; 16: 187-193
        • Press, Ganey Associates
        Inpatient satisfaction survey.
        Press, Ganey Associates, Inc, South Bend, IN2001
        • Jacobson A.
        • Palec D.
        The job of IV insertion by expert nurses.
        Presented at the Midwest Nursing Research Society Conference, Cleveland, OH2001 (March)
        • Asai T.
        • Hidaka I.
        • Kawashima A.
        • Miki T.
        • Inada K.
        • Kawachi S.
        Efficacy of catheter needles with safeguard mechanisms.
        Anaesthesia. 2002; 57: 572-577
        • Cote C.J.
        • Roth A.G.
        • Wheeler M.
        • ter Rahe C.
        • Rae B.R.
        • Dsida R.M.
        • et al.
        Traditional versus new needle retractable IV catheter in children.
        Anesth Analg. 2003; 96: 387-391
        • Rivers D.L.
        • Aday L.A.
        • Frankowski R.F.
        • Felknor S.
        • White D.
        • Nichols B.
        Predictors of nurses’ acceptance of an intravenous catheter safety device.
        Nurs Res. 2003; 52: 249-255
      2. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/needlestick. Retrieved January 7, 2005.

        • Millam D.A.
        How to teach good venipuncture technique.
        Am J Nurs. 1993; 93: 38-41
        • Tagalakis V.
        • Kahn S.R.
        • Libman M.
        • Blostein M.
        The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis.
        Am J Med. 2002; 113: 146-151
        • Trimble T.
        Peripheral I.V. starts.
        Nursing. 2003; 33: 17
        • Millam D.A.
        • Hadaway L.C.
        On the road to successful I.V. starts.
        Nursing. 2003; 33: 1-14
        • Millam D.A.
        Tips for improving your venipuncture techniques.
        Nursing. 1983; 8313: 40-41
        • Sinclair R.C.
        • Maxfield A.
        • Marks E.L.
        • Thompson D.R.
        • Gershon R.R.M.
        Prevalence of safer needle devices and factors associated with their adoption.
        Public Health Rep. 2002; 117: 340-349
        • Ihrig M.
        • Cookson S.T.
        • Campbell K.
        • Hartstein A.I.
        • Jarvis W.R.
        Evaluation of the acceptability of a needleless vascular-access system by nurses.
        Am J Infect Control. 1997; 25: 434-438
        • Vaughn T.E.
        • McCoy K.D.
        • Beekmann S.E.
        • Woolson R.E.
        • Torner J.C.
        • Doebbeling B.N.
        Factors promoting consistent adherence to safe needle precautions among hospital workers.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004; 25: 548-555
        • Miller J.M.
        • Goetz A.M.
        • Squier C.
        • Muder R.R.
        Reduction in nosocomial intravenous device-related bacteremias after institution of an intravenous therapy team.
        J Intraven Nurs. 1996; 19: 103-106
        • Robertson K.J.
        The role of the I.V. specialist in health care reform.
        J Intraven Nurs. 1995; 18: 130-144
        • Maki D.G.
        • Ringer M.
        Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters.
        Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114: 845-854
        • Scalley R.D.
        • Van C.S.
        • Cochran R.S.
        The impact of an I.V. team on the occurrence of intravenous-related phlebitis.
        J Intraven Nurs. 1992; 15: 100-109
        • Meier P.A.
        • Fredrickson M.
        • Catney M.
        • Nettleman M.D.
        Impact of a dedicated intravenous therapy team on nosocomial bloodstream infection rates.
        Am J Infect Control. 1998; 2: 388-392
        • Soifer N.E.
        • Borzak S.
        • Edlin B.R.
        • Weinstein R.A.
        Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team.
        Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 473-477