Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 37, Issue 4 , Pages 299-307 , July 2008

Electronic feedback messages for home spirometry lung transplant recipients

  • Sarah J. Pangarakis, RN, MS, CCRN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    • ,
  • Kathleen Harrington, RN, BSN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • ,
  • Ruth Lindquist, RN, PhD, FAAN, APRN-BC

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • ,
  • Cynthia Peden-McAlpine, RN, PhD, APRN-BC

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • ,
  • Stanley Finkelstein, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology/Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Stanley Finkelstein, PhD, Division of Health Informatics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

References 

  1. Petty TL. Simple office spirometry. Clin Chest Med. 2001;22:845–859
  2. DeMeo DL, Ginns LC. Lung transplantation at the turn of the century. Annu Rev Med. 2001;52:185–201
  3. Finkelstein SM, Snyder M, Edin-Stibbe C, et al. Monitoring progress after lung transplantation from home-patient adherence. J Med Eng Technol. 1996;20:203–210
  4. Finkelstein SM, Lindgren B, Prasad B, et al. Reliability and validity of spirometry measurements in a paperless home monitoring diary program for lung transplantation. Heart Lung. 1993;22:523–533
  5. Lindgren BR, Finkelstein SM, Prasad BN, et al. Determination of reliability and validity in home monitoring data of pulmonary function tests following lung transplantation. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:539–550
  6. Finkelstein SM, Snyder M, Stibbe CE, et al. Staging of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome using home spirometry. Chest. 1999;116:120–126
  7. Sabati N, Snyder M, EdinStibbe C, Lindgren B, Finkelstein S. Facilitators and barriers to adherence with home monitoring using electronic spirometry. AACN Clin Issues Adv Pract Acute Crit Care. 2001;12:178–185
  8. Morlion B, Knoop C, Paiva M, Estenne M. Internet-based home monitoring of pulmonary function after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:694–697
  9. Chlan L, Synder M, Finkelstein S, et al. Clinical methods (promoting adherence to an electronic home spirometry research program after lung transplantation). Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:36–40
  10. Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5:257–262
  11. Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327:542–545
  12. Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:647–660
  13. Holt CL, Clark EM, Kreuter MW, Scharff DP. Does locus of control moderate the effects of tailored health education materials?. Health Educ Res. 2000;15:393–403
  14. McDaniel RW, Bach CA. Focus group research: the question of scientific rigor. Rehabil Nurs Res. 1996;5:53–59
  15. Lindquist R. Don't forget the pilot work!. Heart Lung. 1991;20:91–92
  16. Finkelstein SM, Scudiero A, Lindgren B, Snyder M, Hertz MI. Decision support for the triage of lung transplant recipients on the basis of home-monitoring spirometry an symptom reporting. Heart Lung. 2005;34:201–208
  17. Ruff CC, Alexander IM, McKie C. The use of focus group methodology in health disparities research. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53:134–140
  18. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott; 1999;
  19. Taylor-Powell E, Renner M. Analyzing qualitative data (G3658-12). University of Wisc. -extension Madison, WI. 2003. Extension Service Report Madison, WI: Cooperative Extension; 1-10.
  20. Teichman BJ, Burker EJ, Weiner M, Egan TM. Factors associated with adherence to treatment regimens after lung transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:113–121
  21. ScisneyMatlock M, Glazewki L, McClerking C, Kachorek L. Development and evaluation of DASH diet tailored messages for hypertension treatment. Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19:78–87
  22. Weinstein JN. The missing piece: Embracing shared decision making to reform health care. Spine. 2000;25:1–4
  23. Bennett SJ, Litzelman DK, Wright A, et al. The PUMP UP tailored computerized program for heart failure care. Nurs Outlook. 2006;54:39–45
  24. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27:S227–S232
  25. Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension (impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control). Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:285–292
  26. Dijkstra A. Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:527–539
  27. Cahill J. Patient participation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1996;24:561–571
  28. Carpenito LJ. Nursing care plans and documentation: nursing diagnoses and collaborative problems. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 1995;
  29. Bosch-Capblanch X, Abba K, Prictor M, Garner P. Contracts between patients and healthcare practitioners for improving patients' adherence to treatment, prevention and health promotion activities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD004808

 This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grant R01NR009212.

PII: S0147-9563(07)00171-9

doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.07.001

Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 37, Issue 4 , Pages 299-307 , July 2008

Article Tools