Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 17-27 , January 2008

Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Janet L. Nieveen, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing-Lincoln Division, Lincoln, Nebraska
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Janet Nieveen, PhD, RN, College of Nursing-Lincoln Division, 123 Commerce Court, PO Box 880220, Lincoln, NE 68588-0220.
    • ,
  • Lani M. Zimmerman, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing-Lincoln Division, Lincoln, Nebraska
    • ,
  • Susan A. Barnason, PhD, RN, CCRN, CEN, CS

      Affiliations

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing-Lincoln Division, Lincoln, Nebraska
    • ,
  • Bernice C. Yates, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska.

References 

  1. Jenkins D, Stanton B, Jono R. Quantifying and predicting recovery after heart surgery. Psychosom Med. 1994;56:203–212
  2. Miller K, Grindell C. Comparison of symptoms of younger and older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res. 2004;13:179–193
  3. Moore S. Development of discharge information for recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res. 1994;17:170–177
  4. Artinian N, Duggan C. Sex differences in patient recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung. 1995;24:483–494
  5. DiMattio M, Tulman L. A longitudinal study of functional status and correlates following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in women. Nurs Res. 2003;52:98–107
  6. Edell-Gustafsson U, Hetta J, Aren G, et al. Measurement of sleep and quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting: a pilot study. Int J Nurs Pract. 1997;3:239–246
  7. Redeker N. Symptoms reported by older and middle-aged adults after coronary bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res. 1993;2:148–159
  8. Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Brey B, Catlin S, Nieveen J. Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. 2002;17:132–141
  9. Redeker N, Mason D, Wykpisz E, et al. Sleep patterns in women after coronary artery bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res. 1996;9:155-22
  10. Ruiz B, Dibble S, Gilliss C, et al. Predictors of general activity 8 weeks after cardiac surgery. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5:59–65
  11. Spertus J, Winder J, Dewhurst T, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333–341
  12. Piper B, Dibble S, Dodd M, et al. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998;25:677–684
  13. Moore S. A comparison of women’s and men’s symptoms during home recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung. 1995;24:495–501
  14. Tack B, Gilliss C. Nurse-monitored cardiac recovery: a description of the first 8 weeks. Heart Lung. 1990;19:491–499
  15. The University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing Symptom Management Faculty Group. A model for symptom management. Image J Nurs Sch. 1994;16:272–276
  16. Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, et al. Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33:668–676
  17. Wu C. Assessment of postdischarge concerns of coronary artery bypass graft patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995;10:1–7
  18. Savage L, Grap M. Telephone monitoring after early discharge for cardiac surgery patients. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:154–159
  19. Artinian N, Duggan C, Miller P. Age differences in patient recovery patterns following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2:453–461
  20. Jaarsma T, Kastermans M, Dassen T, et al. Problems of cardiac patients in early recovery. J Adv Nurs. 1995;21:21–27
  21. Stewart B, Archbold P. Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: part one. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:477–481
  22. Stewart B, Archbold P. Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: part two. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16:77–81
  23. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382–385
  24. Langeluddecke P, Fulcher G, Baird D, et al. A prospective evaluation of the psychosocial effects of coronary artery bypass surgery. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33:37–45
  25. Grant J, Davis L. Focus on quantitative methods: selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:269–274
  26. Waltz C, Strickland O, Lenz E. Measurement in nursing research. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company; 1991;
  27. Crane P. Fatigue and physical activity in older women after myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 2005;34:30–38
  28. Plach S, Heidrich S. Women’s perceptions of their social roles after heart surgery and coronary angioplasty. Heart Lung. 2001;30:117–127
  29. Gallagher R. Commentary on: comparison of symptoms of younger and older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Nurs Res. 2004;13:194–198

PII: S0147-9563(07)00045-3

doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002

Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 17-27 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution