Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 125-131 (March 2007)


View previous. 11 of 15 View next.

Normal coronary arteries in patients with systolic heart failure who have higher body mass index

Prasanna Kumar Venkatesh, MD, Janos Molnar, MD, Paari Dominic Swaminathan, MD, Sandeep Khosla, MD, FACC, FSCAI, Rohit R. Arora, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAICorresponding Author Information

Background

Previous research has shown an association between higher body mass index (BMI) and lower mortality in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods

We compared the prevalence of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) and risk factors in obese versus non-obese patients with HF. Eighty-four consecutive patients with systolic HF who underwent coronary angiography in a single institution were categorized by BMI into non-obese (BMI < 30, n = 42) and obese (BMI ≥ 30, n = 42) subjects.

Results

Chi-square analysis demonstrated a greater prevalence of normal coronary arteries and a lesser prevalence of CAD in the obese patients compared with the non-obese patients (64% [27/42] of obese patients vs 43% [18/42] non-obese patients had normal coronary arteries, P < .05). Among the obese patients, the subgroup with normal coronary arteries had a higher BMI (39 vs 32, P < .001) and was younger (51 vs 63 years, P < .005) compared with those with CAD. Although the prevalence of significant CAD (>50% diameter stenosis) was similar between obese and non-obese patients, the obese subgroup had a lower high-density lipoprotein (39 vs 49 mg/dL, P < .05).

Conclusions

Angiographically normal coronary arteries were more prevalent in patients with systolic HF who have a higher BMI.

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Rohit R. Arora, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chicago Medical School, NCVAMC 3001, Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064.

PII: S0147-9563(06)00282-2

doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.10.004


View previous. 11 of 15 View next.

Advertisement