Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 125-135, March 2000

Bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy in bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review

San Antonio, Texas, and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

From the aDepartment of Respiratory Care, University of Texas at San Antonio, and the bDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton

Abstract 

Objectives: This study had two objectives: (1) to examine the effects of bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis; (2) to determine any differences between manual and mechanical techniques for bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy. Design: The study design was a systematic review of the literature that used an exhaustive search for trials and review methods prescribed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Inclusion Criteria: Randomized controlled trials examined patient groups, interventions, and dependent variables. Patients: Patients included those with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (emphysema or chronic bronchitis) or bronchiectasis. Interventions: Any of the following interventions or combinations thereof were included: manual interventions, such as postural drainage, chest percussion, vibration, chest shaking, directed coughing, or forced exhalation technique. Controls: Controls of the study were as follows: no intervention; placebo; coughing; and mechanical interventions, such as mechanical vibration. Results: The search identified 99 potential trials; inclusion or exclusion analysis left 7, which examined a total of 126 patients. Mean score on trial quality was 1.4 (5 = greatest). Three separate trials (N = 51) found statistically significant effects for bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy on sputum production and radioaerosol clearance. No trials (N = 126) found statistically significant effects on pulmonary function variables or differences between manual and mechanical techniques. Conclusions: Considering the small sizes, low quality, and mixed results from the trials, the research on bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy is inconclusive. There is a need for adequately sized, high-quality, randomized controlled trials with uniform patient populations to examine the effects of bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy. (Heart Lung® 2000;29:125-35.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 14.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprints not available from author.

PII: S0147-9563(00)90008-6

doi:10.1016/S0147-9563(00)90008-6

Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 125-135, March 2000